2000 words limit Assignment Instructions This assessment requires you to write a 2000 word +/- 10% report, written in the first person, which focuses on four of your learning objectives from your last clinical practicum. You should critically review your learning objectives and how this experience has impacted on your professional role development. Introduction: Give…
Week 1 Discuss the questions below from the Required Readings (minimum 150 words) Forum Discussion Questions: (choose 3 questions to answer) • What are your personal medical beliefs and how do they relate to your personal medical and/or healing experiences? How do they relate to what was discussed in Session 1, Lecture 2 . • …
Task I want you to use the framework we have given you to critically analyse the management of the postimpact phase of your selected event and the hypothetical recurrence of that event today and report on those things that were done well and those things that could have been improved. If we learn from history we will be better able to manage similar events in the future. The framework below is a suggested layout for this assignment with marking weightings included. A copy of the assignment marking sheet that will be used for this assignment is attached at the end of this assignment guide. Although you have studied a number of areas of emergency management pertinent to the impact and postimpact phase of emergency/ disaster operations management in your studies, in this assignment we only require you to critically analyse two of the postimpact areas (Part A) and two of the Hypothetical areas (Part B). Introduction (10%) Aim Objectives Authority Scope Relevant history Part A Post Impact Phase Analysis (30%) Critically analyse two (2) of the following PLUS the Conclusions and Recommendations: Search and rescue 10% Triage and casualty care 10% Critical incident stress management 10% Disaster victim identification and coronial inquiry 10% Community services 10% Recovery and restoration 10% Conclusions and recommendations 10% Part B Hypothetical Assessment (30%) Critically analyse two (2) of the following PLUS the Conclusions and Recommendations: Warning systems How would it function now compared to then? 10% Legislation and regulation How effective is the legislation and regulations now compared to then? 10% People What people would be affected today compared with when the event originally occurred? What would the effects be on people? 10% Infrastructure What would be the damage and effect on infrastructure today compared to when the event originally occurred? 10% Buildings What are the expected effects on buildings etc. today compared with when the event occurred? 10% Emergency services What emergency services would be involved today? What would their roles and functions be today? What are their capabilities today compared with then? 10% Cost What is the estimated cost of the event should it occur today compared with when it originally occurred? 10% Conclusions and recommendations. 10% Part C Critical Self Assessment (20%) Critically analyse and reflect on your performance during the subject and in production of your report. In this self assessment some of the questions you may wish to consider are: • What difficulties, if any, did you encounter in locating/accessing data for your report? • If you had any difficulties, how did you overcome them? • What would you do differently next time? Rationale This assignment follows on from your studies in EMG206. The assignment completes your study of emergency operations management and focuses on the postimpact phase of your selected emergency event, but also includes a hypothetical assessment of your chosen event as if it occurred today. Your assignment comprises three parts: • Part A investigate the postimpact phase of your selected event and identify strengths and…
4000 words limit This assignment has two parts: Part 1 (Group Report) is to be completed in a group of 3 students. There is a limit of 4000 words for this part. Part 2 (Individual Presentation) is to be completed individually by each group member, who has to perform an individual presentation about one of…
Lex101 Assessment Task: Annotated Bibliography Instructions Topic : LGBTI (topic that used for the law reform ) · A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, journals, etc.) you have used for researching a topic. Bibliographies are sometimes called ‘References’ or ‘Works Cited’ depending on the style format. A bibliography usually includes…
2500 words Part1: Initiation Scenario Furniture4U is a small business selling variety of office furniture in your local area. However, the business has grown to a greater extent in the last five years. Number of employees has been increased from 25 to 100 in the last 5 years and the turnover from £100k…
Word limit : 2000 ±10% words Assessment weight : 30% Aveo Group Limited’s reputation has taken a big hit from the Four Corners study aired on ABC on Monday, 26th June 2017 in which Aveo was accused of ripping off customers almost all of them elderly and vulnerable, at its retirement villages. Following the media…
For this assignment, imagine that you are the manager of a health care organization confronting a number of issues potentially affecting the provision of safe, highquality health care practices. You have decided to focus first on the issue that has particular relevance to your area of specialization or professional goals, or that presents a situation you might expect to encounter in your leadership role. As you consider an appropriate course of action to address this issue, you have decided to begin by searching the case study literature with the intention of possibly gaining insight into the actions of other health care leaders who have dealt with similar issues and may have provided a sound solution to the problem or issues he or she faced. A colleague with whom you have spoken about this has recommended the Buchbinder, Shanks, and Buchbinder text, Cases in Health Care Management as an excellent case study reference. For your convenience, Appendix B lists all cases by topic (Leadership; Quality/Patient Safety; Finance; Healthcare Professionals/Human Resources; Health Disparities/Cultural Competence; Ethics/Law/Conflict of Interest; Crossing the Line/Fraud) and by primary and secondary settings. In the Buchbinder, Shanks, and Buchbinder text, locate two case studies that are most closely aligned with the issue(s) you have decided to address. In addition, be sure that your selected case studies will enable you to •Evaluate the effectiveness of different leadership approaches in facilitating collaborative professional relationships across disciplines. •Evaluate health care leaders’ ability to communicate effectively. •Analyze the role of communication in both creating and resolving a problem in health care leadership. •Evaluate how effectively leaders address any issues involving ethical practice, diversity or inclusion. •Evaluate health care leaders’ ability to manage and prioritize leadership responsibilities to resolve issues. Note: The case studies in the text may not supply all of the information you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer plausible conclusions. Note: For your convenience, Appendix B in Cases in Health Care Management lists all cases by topic (Leadership, Quality/Patient Safety, Finance, Healthcare Professionals/Human Resources, Health Disparities/Cultural Competence, Ethics/Law/Conflict of Interest, Crossing the Line/Fraud) and by primary and secondary settings. Note: Do not use Cases 9, 65, or 67, as these are used elsewhere in the course. Assignment Instructions Complete the following steps: 1.Use the APA format for the title page. Include the title of the case studies you have chosen. For example, your title could read: “Demonstrating Effective Leadership: Case 82 – When Yes Means No and Case 83 – Emergency Divert Status.” ?Include the case study in your references and use intext citation when appropriate. 2.In the body of the paper, begin by briefly summarizing the facts surrounding the case studies. After you identify who the leaders are and the issues they are faced with, analyze the factors that you believe contributed to each issue. ?Note: In graduate level writing, you should minimize the use of direct quotes. Lengthy quotes do not count toward assignment minimums. It is your interpretation of the material and its application to practice that is assessed?Remember, the case studies may not supply all of the information you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer plausible conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any speculations that you make as such. ?An excellent tool for analyzing factors that contribute to a problem is the Fishbone Diagram, linked in the Resources. Use of this tool is highly recommended, but it is optional, and you will not hand in your diagram with this assignment. 3.Compare and contrast the leadership approaches or styles these leaders use. Analyze how the approaches or styles make these leaders more or less effective in building interprofessional relationships across disciplines within the organization. Based on your analysis, determine how likely it will be that these leaders will be able to build and maintain such relationships with other communities and leaders outside their organization. Support your analysis with citations and appropriate APA references to peerreviewed journals or scholarly sources. 4.Analyze how well these leaders communicate, verbally or in writing. Analyze the role of communication and communication strategies in both creating and resolving the issues presented in the case study….
Thе largest dividend уielding cоmpanies in the FTSE 350 London Stock Exchange include: Carillon Debenhams Direct Line Galliford Try Petrofac Phoenix Group Taylor WimpeyChoose ONE company from the list above. Write a report to an investor considering investing in the company that you have selected, referring to the company’s listing on the London Stock Exchange. Your report should cover the following areas: (a) Discount Rates & Capital Structure i. Calculate your chosen company’s Cost of Equity (Ke), Cost of Debt (Kd), and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for each year for at least the last 5 years. Show your workings and state the sources for any of your assumptions. 15 marks ii. Critically assess and discuss the capital structure that your chosen company has and the impact that these choices have made on its cost of equity, cost of debt, and WACC. If your company has any debt funding, assess its ability to make the repayments required using a range of appropriate ratios. 10 marks You should choose one company and do all that, you need to calculate everything by yourself. Use CAPM model to calculate cost of equity.
Requirements for paper: After the first semester teaching a course, analуsis of assessment results shows students either significantly underachieve based on course standards, or they overachieve. Define the chosen scenario and describe a detailed course evaluation plan. In your analysis, include initial standards, goals, learning objectives, assessments (formative and/or summative), teaching philosophy, and instructional design model. Describe changes you would make to the original course design (each aspect listed) and the process you would use to determine the most appropriate modifications. Reference book (read chapter 15, 16, & 18) Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
