Annotated Bibliography Instructions Step 3: Write an annotated bibliography. Each of the 10 in your reference list should be followed by a brief (usually about 150 word) descriptive and evaluative paragraph explaining how this source will help to develop your paper.
The HB 423 – ARNPA/PA Florida Senate Bill is one focusing on controlled substance prescribing Assignment Criteria: For this assignment, build upon Assignment 2 Policy Brief and write an indepth analysis on the selected bill: 1. Select a point of view the master’s prepared nurse will represent in the written analysis (e.g. chronic illness in elderly; reduce hospital readmissions related to rural areas lack of providership; etc.) 2. Make a case for or against the policy change. 3. Select the organization the master’s prepared nurse will represent for this assignment (i.e. legislative staff, hospital chief nursing officer, president of a professional nursing organization, state board of nursing, or a government official, etc.) 4. Follow the topical outline bullets below. Use each bullet as a level 1 or 2 heading for the paper. 5. Search the literature for four (4) evidencebased interventions on the bill or policy of interest. The literature can be individual studies or systematic reviews. A systematic review counts as one (1) intervention. If using a systematic review, report on the review, not on the studies identified in the review. All the studies MUST be intervention studies. Review what constitutes an intervention study. o Identify the databases (e.g., CINAHL, Medline) and key terms used in initiating the collective search for all the studies (not each study) o Describe the bill or policy found in the literature as it relates to the master’s prepared nurse’s state and other states where the bill/policy has been implemented. 6. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’). 7. Include a minimum of four (4) references less than five (5) years old, unless they are classical works as defined by APA, from scholarly peerreviewed journals to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory). Instructor may revise these guidelines. Follow the bulleted outline (i.e. use bullets as level 1 or 2 headings) • Introduction (APA does not recommend using the heading Introduction. Use the complete title of the selected bill. o Identify the organization or group represented by the bill o Clearly identify the issue or problem o Provide any evidencebased guidelines or information published on the bill’s issue o Expand on the history of the bill to support the idea and purpose of the bill. • Key policy events (regulatory and legislative). Does any previous legislation or regulation precede this particular issue? Focus on those aspects of the legislation or regulation that relate to financial and or reimbursement effects. Lists are often helpful in this section of the paper • Financial data. Provide financial data (either gathered from your facility or obtained in the literature), and apply the information to the issue as a means of supporting the selection • Key/major stakeholders. Identify and explain the implication of their views. Include the bill/issue sponsor(s) • Social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors. Identify the factors that may impact the various stakeholders or the decisions related to the issue. You are providing a context of the issue in this section, giving key demographic, financial and/or statistical information or noticeable trends of current studies that impact your issue. This is a substantial part of the analysis. Each topic of this section should be addressed separately. Relate each section to the population of interest selected for the bill or policy assignment • Policy intervention options. Which options are available/relevant to this issue? Include whether there are any current legislative/regulation activities or proposals under consideration and how they relate or differ from what you are proposing/advocating. Offer alternative solutions and make sound reasons that support the alternatives you offer • Proposed recommendation. From the research and analysis, what is the recommendation you propose (e.g. your scholarly perspective supported by scholarly citations)? You are making the recommendation based on the sound points and information provided in the preceding sections of your paper • Nursing implications. Identify the implications for nursing as it relates to patient safety and quality. You may want to conduct a literature review to identify other states or areas where the issue has been addressed. Review their nursing implications for your state consideration …
First PageIdentify and explain the ways that humans learn (reading, writing, speaking, listening). Analyze yourself in relation to your strongest and weakest areas of learning and provide examples that reflect how you plan on improving your learning skills. Your response should be at least 200 words in length. Second PagePaul and Elder encourage students to redefine grades as levels of thinking and learning. What do they mean by this? In your view, are grades necessary or unnecessary for selfassessment? Provide an example from your own experience to support your position. Your response should be at least 200 words in length.
The reаdіngs this week identify аnd exрlоre innovation in an organisational context. Specifically, you should first identify the key issues in innovation, then look to assess CAS principles and practices arising from the examination of innovation, and finally briefly comment on the place of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) in looking at innovation. Your explorations of innovation in an organisational context. The workplace problem is complexity of teams the complexity can undermine communications, leadership, motivations, organizational behavior and performance more so if the managers fail to institutionalize the concept of system thinking among the members (Stacey, 3011, p. 28). Therefore, the diversity of the teams possesses a dire challenge with a capacity of limiting the entire performance of an organization. Critically evaluates key arguments from both a scholarly and a practitioneroriented point of view; Critiques underlying assumptions evident in the articles and identifies any new insights for practice and scholarship; extends the thinking and application of your review with additional resources and experiential analyses. Please add introduction, heading and subheading and Conclusion. Citation and References year 2000 and up See attached Needs further development is more analysis and support from the literature. It is important to show good understanding and reflections of the literature throughout your writing. Adding a few practical examples or cases within the literature will help your analysis be more practical. You start your CAL report in your introduction where you are addressing the importance of your workplace problem, which is addressing workplace problems. Although you give an interesting background and you are emphasizing the importance of the problem using references to the literature, it would be nice to associate the problem also more explicitly to your workplace environment. What is special in your workplace environment that made you select this problem? In the next section you continue identifying examples and situations that result in problems for managers in their everyday work. You then discuss the importance and give general guidelines on how to address the issues. You are using your own words to present your ideas and you integrate and prioritize the presented issues in a natural and smooth manner. You need to explicitly associate this process to the knowledge creation process in a more detailed manner. Some information as for example what paradigm you adopted in orders to address the problem, and how you as a manager have experienced these workplace problem, would have improved the quality of your work. Add Introduction, heading and subheading and Conclusion. Year 2000 and up citation and references.
Please scour the internet to find at least two videos related to the taskcentered and solution focused approaches. Copy and paste the video links into your discussion, and then respond to the following: Why did you select this video? Was there anything, in particular, that resonated with you or helped you to understand one of the developmental theories? How do you think viewing the video might help your classmates? Is there anything, in particular, that you believe the video missed?
Reflective Account OHS Level 5 Diploma Learner Name: Unit 601: Develop and implement the health and safety policy Reflective Account Assessment Criteria Learner to provide narrative under each statement of how they meet the criteria and list the number of the piece(s) of evidence supplied to demonstrate this. You must provide answers to…
You maу agree or dіsagree with the рroposition, but in either case you should make an argument about which case study is more effective in dealing with the issue. Your essay should be 2000 words in length. GENERAL COMMENTS AND ADVICE This assessment item is worth 30% of your final marks. The key tasks are to: 1. Select one proposition to discuss o Which do you find most interesting? 2. Select two case studies from this unit o Which two case studies are most appropriate/ relevant for the topic? o Some topics will suit certain case studies better than others o Have you found sufficient resources relating to the case studies and the selected issue? 3. Discuss the proposition by making an argument as to which case study deals with the selected issue more effectively. o Do you agree or disagree with the proposition? Why? o Which case study deals with the issue more effectively? Why 2 SOME KEY BASES OF COMPARISON There are a number of ‘bases of comparison’ generally used in comparative politics. A suggestive though not complete list is outlined below. There are many ways to compare/contrast regimes, but you should ONLY focus on those which are relevant to making your argument / discussing your particular proposition. You should also look at the ‘checklist for essays and term papers’ under the assessment tab on blackboard. Some useful bases of comparison in comparative politics are: • Regime type: how can the political system be broadly characterised? • Political institutions: what are the key institutions of the political system? • Branches of government: what is the formal distribution (and/or separation) of powers between executive, legislature and judiciary? • State capacity: What is the state’s ability to carry out its policies / ensure stability? • State autonomy: What is the state’s ability to wield power independently of the public? • Decisionmaking: who holds formal power? Who holds informal power in the political system? • Political conflict and competition: How do ruling elites gain power? What is the role of political parties? What is the electoral system? • Representation: most regimes claim to “represent the will” of the people. What claims does the political system make about this? Are these claim supportable? • Political participation: what role (or form of participation) do ordinary citizens have in political decision making? What is the role of ‘civil society’? • Legitimacy: what is the government claim to political legitimacy? What gives rulers the ‘right to rule’ in the eyes of the public? Do traditional authorities have a significant ongoing role? • Conflict: How does the political system (including the constitution, electoral system) manage ethnic diversity, minority nationalism, economic or social conflict? • Ideology: How does the political regime balance freedom and equality? • Political attitudes and culture: What broad values are evident in popular attitudes to politics? • Political economy: What is the relationship between the state and the market in the political system? How is economic wealth and power distributed? What is the system of land tenure? How does this affect debates over development? • History: Does the history of the state or nation help explain certain key features of the political system? Once again, you should select wisely. Only focus on the comparisons which best help you make an argument about which case study is more ‘effective’ in dealing with the…
Introduction Assignment Overview Climate change is a global environmental health issue affecting all countries in the world and is a result of human development and activity. It is related to the ecological footprint of the human population. Case Assignment In this Case Assignment, you will analyze your individual ecological footprint and will examine the footprint…
Dеveloр а comprehensіve review of conventional biocide evaluation using MPN technique. The review should address other possible techniques that have, are being considered for use to enhance results in addition to clear recommendation and selection criteria for the best Biocide. Please note: Biocides such as Formaldehуde, glutaraldehyde and THPS only (for killing the bacteria in the water or crude oil pipeline)
Ovеrview оf Assessment 2 Students аre required tо prepare an essay (1400 words) on a key eсonomiс issue (as detailed in the assessment document to be released in week 7) for a Minister or CEO who has limited time to research the economic problem or issue for themselves, as detailed in the research essay documentation. The essay should provide the reader with an overview of current economic thinking and research on the economic issue, briefly detailing the supporting economic theory. It is a requirement of this assessment item that students provide appropriate intext citations and a reference list inclusive of full bibliographic details of all cited research materials (e.g. academic journals, data etc.). The required referencing style is APA. The subject content of this task will relate to the materials covered in lectures weeks 1-7
