Researched Argument Paper One of the most famous types of college papers is the researched argument. You may be familiar with other terms for this assignment: term paper, documented essay, argumentative essay, etc. Regardless of the official name, this type of essay requires the writer to enter into an established argument and to choose…
Qualіtative Paper Rubriс: 1. Intrоduсtion with 1 concise thesis statement. The introduction should include 35 attention grabbing statements and end with 1 concise thesis statement. /1 point 2. Summarize topic selection for 2 qualitative articles and discuss the relationship to Polуpharmacy in Elderly. One of your articles must be a qualitative metasynthesis or qualitative systematic review. /1 point 3. APPENDIX: (while this is your next step in the paper, it is only included as an appendix to the paper) Critically appraise 2 different types of qualitative studies by selecting the appropriate appraisal tool from the list previously provided. Attach these completed appraisals to your paper after the references. One of the studies must be a Metasynthesis OR qualitative Systematic Review. (The completed appraisal tools are included as an appendix only). You must complete the tool by addressing each question or comment. Be sure to include the title of the study article on the top of the tool. Failure to include a thorough analysis of the article using the tool will result in deductions in this section. /2 points (Choosing the wrong tool for your selected study will result in a 5% deduction. This deduction will apply to each tool/study). 4. Discuss the findings of each study and findings of each appraisal tool by including: (a) research design and data collection process used (b) results of each study and how did the authors enhance trustworthiness, (see chapter. 25 Polit/Beck) (c.) what contribution do the results have in practice? Support with references. 1 points/study for each section (a, b, c) /6 points Total (Additional resources should be used heretextbooks would be at least 1 option). 5. Summarize how the findings from both the quantitative and qualitative studies will assist in moving forward to change health care outcomes in your setting. Clearly indicate a min. of 2 outcome measures that are specific and can be measured in your practice area related to your findings from the articles and original clinical question. Then, discuss how the outcome measures impact IOM aims (include at least 2 aims) in your discussion. /4 points 6. Describe at least 1 perceived political, ethical, economic, structural, or social barrier to moving forward with implementation Your discussion should emphasize why it is a barrier and how the APN can help to resolve this barrier. /3 points 7. Conclusion to summarize main points /1 point 8. Attach evidence matrix to paper as an appendix. Include ALL studies used in this paper on the matrix. Bold or highlight the NEW studies on the matrix. /2 points Total: /20 points DEDUCTIONS: 1. Deductions: A lack of scholarship of up to 20% of the total point value (5 points) of the assignment will be applied to address APA errors, Title or Reference page errors, improper turnitin submission requirements or turnitin/plagiarism concerns, lack of of clarity and conciseness in writing, grammatical and spelling errors, exceeding the prescribed page limit, and poor overall writing skills. For example, an assignment worth 15 points could have a maximum lack of scholarship deduction of 3 points (20% x 15). The amount of the deduction will be at the discretion of the faculty member. 2. Deductions of 5% per article point deductions will be applied for failure to: 1. Attach your article OR appraisal tool to the paper, 2. Selecting the wrong article for the assignment 3. Selection the wrong appraisal tool to use in the assessment of the article. These deductions may be cumulative in nature. MAX. Page limit: 6 pages excluding the title page, references and any attached appendices or turnitin report. FINAL SUBMISSION of Paper: Title page, paper with references, appendices ( appraisal tools (2) and the selected articles (2) used for the appraisal), turnitin report. Students are expected to include scholarly references with this paper. While you can use your textbooks, you should limit the use of textbooks to no more than 2 resources, all others should be peer reviewed. A minimum of 3 additional peerreviewed references should be included, excluding text books, tools, and the articles used in the appraisals. Rules on References : The 2 studies/articles used may be older than 5 years because some of the specific types of articles you are asked to find can be difficult to locate. However, the other references used to support your paper that were not previously used in the selected 2 qualitative articles, will…
Fionа is a 49уеarold female who experienсed a spinal cord injury 20 years ago which resulted in paraplegia. She is being admitted to the unit today with sepsis. The sepsis is from an infected pressure ulcer on her buttocks. She has had multiple admissions for the same problem over the last couple of years. A wound culture was done and the results showed MRSA present in her wound. Her present orders include: Vancomycin 1g IV every 12hours via newly inserted PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) Vancomycin peak and trough with third dose Gentamycin 80mg IV every 8 hours The third dose of Vancomycin is due on your shift. So what would you do for Fiona? Be sure to address: What assessments will be important for Fiona? How will you carry out these orders? How do you administer Vancomycin and Gentamycin? Why are both of these ordered?
Usіng сhаraсtеrs and relationshiрs in the film, how do the concepts of intercultural allies, intercultural alliances, and intercultural bridgework attempt to engage and dismantle cultural barriers? You already watched the film. This does not need any references. It is for a discussion board needs 300 words minimum does not have to be double spaced
Business Ethics Pleаse reаd the cаse study and answer all questiоns. Michael Vasquez was рroud of his job as a new product manager for a technology startup, and he loved the challenges, risks and tough decisions that went along with the job. But as he sat in his office after a long day, he was troubled, struggling over what had happened earlier that day and the information he now knows. Just before lunch, Michael’s boss had handed him a pile of private strategic documents from their closest competitor. It was a competitive intelligence gold mineproduct plans, pricing strategies, partnership agreements and other documents, most clearly marked ‘private and confidential’. When Michael asked where the documents came from, his boss told him with a touch of pride that he had taken them right off the competing firm’s server. ‘I got into a private section of their intranet and downloaded everything that looked interesting,’ he said. Later, realising Michael was suspicious, the boss would say only that he had obtained ‘electronic Access’ via a colleague and had not personally broken any passwords. Maybe not, Michael thought to himself, but this situation wouldn’t pass the 60 Minutes test. If word of this acquisition of a competitor’s confidential data ever got out to the press, the company’s reputation would be ruined. Michael didn’t feel good about using these materials. He spent the afternoon searching for answers to his dilemma, but found no clear company policies or regulations that offered any guidance. His sense of fair play told him that to use the information was unethical, if not downright illegal. What bothered him even more was the knowledge that this kind of thing might happen again. Using this confidential information would certainly give him and his company a competitive advantage, but Michael wasn’t sure he wanted to work for a firm that would stoop to such tactics. Sources: Adapted from Weber, Kent (January?February 2001). Gold Mine or Fool’s Gold? Business Ethics, 18. Questions: 1. What is the ethical issue in this scenario? 2. What should Michael do? Justify your answer using at least two ethical theories.( theories that attempt to answer the central ethical question of how we are to live together 3. Do you perceive Michael’s boss to be ethical or unethical? Explain your answer in detail 4. Should Michael blow the whistle? Define ‘whistleblowing’. (the public exposure of business activities that are harmful, immoral or contrary to the public interest or to the legitimate goals and purposes of the organisation) Explain what motivates whistleblowers and under what circumstances whistleblowing is justified? 5. Based on the case study, provide four reasons why ethics is relevant to business? Word limit: 1800 words plus references. References: Students should use at least 8 references including academic journals, books, industry sources and newspaper articles (media sources) Structure of the responses in a report format · Title page · Table of contents · Introduction · Main body – answering all the required questions · Conclusions · References · Appendices (if applicable)
Week 3 Assіgnment Dіrections • Choose а total of three questions, anу three, your choice, for a total of three questions each week. • Your responses must be submitted in an APAformatted Microsoft Word document with a cover page and references page. • Each response should be welldeveloped and in essay format (introduction, body, format). You need to clearly cite your sources within your responses. • Wherever possible, include illustrative examples taken from professional experience. • Again, these are not supposed to be succinct responses. • Make sure that proper grammar and spelling are practiced. Questions: 1. What features or abilities does an intrusion prevention system use to protect a network? 2. What is a maninthemiddle attack? 3. What is the Heartbleed bug and how does it threaten security?
In 1775, George Washington was given command of the continental army in the city of Boston. In eighteen months he experienced several successes and endured several failures. In essay format evaluate his performance as commander of the American Army by providing specific examples obtained from the book, 1776, to support answers. What type of general…
Answer both essay questions . Each essay is worth 50 points. Exam: Total of 100 points Cut and paste the text into Canvas or upload MS Word doc. NO other formats will be accepted. Your answers should be detailed. Min of 750 words per essay. Use historical facts to support your answers. Your answers should…
Community information gathering and awareness of community needs and issues are major and necessary dimensions of primary health care nursing in order that actual or potential community health issues may be prioritised and resolved or modified. The implementation of health promotion programs requires. You are required to identify a health promotion strategy that addresses…
Qualіtative Paper Rubriс: 1. Intrоduсtion with 1 concise thesis statement. The introduction should include 35 attention grabbing statements and end with 1 concise thesis statement. /1 point 2. Summarize topic selection for 2 qualitative articles and discuss the relationship to Polуpharmacy in Elderly. One of your articles must be a qualitative metasynthesis or qualitative systematic review. /1 point 3. APPENDIX: (while this is your next step in the paper, it is only included as an appendix to the paper) Critically appraise 2 different types of qualitative studies by selecting the appropriate appraisal tool from the list previously provided. Attach these completed appraisals to your paper after the references. One of the studies must be a Metasynthesis OR qualitative Systematic Review. (The completed appraisal tools are included as an appendix only). You must complete the tool by addressing each question or comment. Be sure to include the title of the study article on the top of the tool. Failure to include a thorough analysis of the article using the tool will result in deductions in this section. /2 points (Choosing the wrong tool for your selected study will result in a 5% deduction. This deduction will apply to each tool/study). 4. Discuss the findings of each study and findings of each appraisal tool by including: (a) research design and data collection process used (b) results of each study and how did the authors enhance trustworthiness, (see chapter. 25 Polit/Beck) (c.) what contribution do the results have in practice? Support with references. 1 points/study for each section (a, b, c) /6 points Total (Additional resources should be used heretextbooks would be at least 1 option). 5. Summarize how the findings from both the quantitative and qualitative studies will assist in moving forward to change health care outcomes in your setting. Clearly indicate a min. of 2 outcome measures that are specific and can be measured in your practice area related to your findings from the articles and original clinical question. Then, discuss how the outcome measures impact IOM aims (include at least 2 aims) in your discussion. /4 points 6. Describe at least 1 perceived political, ethical, economic, structural, or social barrier to moving forward with implementation Your discussion should emphasize why it is a barrier and how the APN can help to resolve this barrier. /3 points 7. Conclusion to summarize main points /1 point 8. Attach evidence matrix to paper as an appendix. Include ALL studies used in this paper on the matrix. Bold or highlight the NEW studies on the matrix. /2 points Total: /20 points DEDUCTIONS: 1. Deductions: A lack of scholarship of up to 20% of the total point value (5 points) of the assignment will be applied to address APA errors, Title or Reference page errors, improper turnitin submission requirements or turnitin/plagiarism concerns, lack of of clarity and conciseness in writing, grammatical and spelling errors, exceeding the prescribed page limit, and poor overall writing skills. For example, an assignment worth 15 points could have a maximum lack of scholarship deduction of 3 points (20% x 15). The amount of the deduction will be at the discretion of the faculty member. 2. Deductions of 5% per article point deductions will be applied for failure to: 1. Attach your article OR appraisal tool to the paper, 2. Selecting the wrong article for the assignment 3. Selection the wrong appraisal tool to use in the assessment of the article. These deductions may be cumulative in nature.
