implementing practice change
CRITICAL Literаture Review Your mаjor assignment for this subject is a literature review, detailing what is alreadу known about your toрic of choice. Conduct a search of the available literature on your chosen topic, and then write a review, summarising the findings of the community of scholars. You may find conflicting results in some cases, so you may find it relevant to compare or contrast some conclusions. NOTE MY TOPIC IS ON CLINICAL AUDIT PATHWAY AND MY CLINICAL AUDIT QUESTION IS:::: Do nurses in an acute care setting in xx hospital comply with the best practice hand hygiene? ASSESSMENT 2 RUBRIC. CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Fair (50 – 59%) Poor (<50%) MARK Structure & organisation (20% of total mark) ? Introduction succinctly identifies the relevance, scope and focus of the paper. ? Body well structured, with coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections or paragraphs. ? Effective use of headings. ? Conclusion appropriate to type and format of response. (1620 marks) ? Introduction identifies relevance, scope and focus of paper but may not be succinct. ? Body well structured, with predominantly coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections or paragraphs. ? Effective use of headings. ? Conclusion predominantly appropriate to type and format of response. (1415 marks) ? Introduction largely appropriate to the task, but doesn’t clearly identify the relevance, scope and focus of the paper. ? Body well structured, with mostly coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections or paragraphs. ? Effective use of headings. ? Conclusion largely appropriate to type and format of response. (1213 marks) ? Introduction may not be appropriate to the task, and doesn’t clearly identify the relevance, scope and focus of the paper. ? Body may not be well structured, with limited coherence and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections or paragraphs. ? Some inappropriate use of headings. ? Conclusion may not be appropriate to type and format of response. (1011 marks) ? Introduction inappropriate to type and format of response, or not evident. ? Body poorly structured and lacks coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections or paragraphs. ? Inappropriate use of headings. ? Conclusion inappropriate to type and format of response or not evident. (<10 marks) /20 Selection of literature (30% of total mark) ? Each source is relevant and credible to the topic – primary source, professionallyoriented, peerreviewed. ? Majority of sources within past 57 years. ? Literature is appropriate to the task. (2630 marks) ? Each source is relevant and credible to the topic. ? Majority of sources within past 57 years. ? Literature predominantly appropriate to the task. (2125 marks) ? Majority of sources are relevant and credible to the topic. ? Majority of sources within past 57 years. ? Literature mostly appropriate to the task. (1820 marks) ? Few sources are relevant and credible to the topic. ? Many sources not within past 57 years. ? Literature may not be appropriate to the task. (1517 marks) ? Majority of sources neither relevant nor credible to the topic. ? Majority of sources not within past 57 years. ? Majority of sources are inappropriate to the task. ? Majority of the topic not addressed. (< 15 marks) /30 Use of literature …